In an era marked by scientific advancements and global challenges, public trust in scientists stands as a cornerstone for informed decision-making and evidence-based policymaking. The significance of this trust has become increasingly apparent during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing battle against climate change. A recent global survey conducted by social scientist Viktoria Cologna at Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, and her colleagues across 67 countries, involving over 71,000 respondents, offers a comprehensive analysis of the state of public trust in scientists post-COVID-19. The study, which is currently a pre-print, provides valuable insights into the complexities of global perceptions and the implications for shaping effective science policies. A news article about this study was first featured in the Nature journal on February 14, 2024.

Public trust in scientific endeavors has wide-ranging implications, influencing individual decisions, governmental policies, and societal responses to global challenges. The ability of societies to navigate crises, like the recent COVID-19 pandemic, has been linked to the level of public trust in scientists. This trust not only facilitates compliance with public health measures but also fosters confidence in vaccination efforts, showcasing its role in effective crisis management.

Spanning from November 2022 to August 2023, the survey reached participants across 67 countries, representing 31% of the world’s nations, accounting for 78% of the global population.

In most places, the researchers recruited participants online through marketing companies, with the exception of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where they used in-person surveys. Respondents were asked to indicate how much they agreed with a dozen statements about the integrity, competency, benevolence and openness of scientists, on a scale of 1 to 5. On a global scale, participants perceived scientists as having high competence, moderate integrity and benevolent intentions. The overall rating of openness to feedback was lower: 23% of participants think that scientists pay only somewhat or very little attention to other views. Three-quarters of people agreed that scientific methods are the best way to find out whether something is true.

By exploring various dimensions of trust in scientists, the study aimed to capture a detailed understanding of global perceptions, examining factors such as competence, benevolence, integrity, and openness.

Key Findings Explored:

  1. Global Trust Landscape: The survey revealed a moderately high level of trust in scientists globally, with an average trust score of 3.62 out of 5. Notably, no country showed an overall low level of trust, indicating a generally positive perception of scientists across the world.
  2. Regional Variations: Trust in scientists exhibited considerable differences across countries and regions. Egypt and India emerged as nations with the highest trust, while Albania and Kazakhstan reported the lowest levels. The study also identified regional patterns, with former Soviet republics displaying relatively low trust.
  3. Political Orientation and Trust: Delving into the complex relationship between political orientation and trust in scientists, the survey found a nuanced association. While overall trust was slightly higher among left-leaning individuals, this correlation varied significantly among countries. Political leadership was identified as a critical factor, with right-leaning parties in some countries fostering reservations against scientists among their supporters.
  4. Discrepancy in Research Priorities: The survey explored the public’s perceived and desired priorities in scientific research, highlighting a notable gap. This discrepancy emphasizes the importance of aligning research priorities with public expectations to foster a more inclusive and responsive scientific community.

The survey’s findings carry significant implications for both policymakers and scientists. Recognizing the variations in global trust levels and understanding the intricate interplay with political factors is crucial for informed decision-making and effective science policies.

Public trust in science plays a vital role in decision-making, policy formulation, and global crisis management. While trust in scientists is generally high globally, the relationship with political leanings is complex. Normative perceptions of scientists’ roles in policymaking vary, with 82% agreeing scientists should communicate with the public, yet opinions on active policy advocacy differ. Younger, more educated, and urban populations tend to support scientists’ engagement in policymaking. The study emphasizes the importance of nuanced, global perspectives on trust in science to inform evidence-based policies.

As the world continues to grapple with complex challenges, maintaining and enhancing public trust in scientists becomes paramount. The global survey sheds light on the resilient trust in scientists post-COVID-19 but also underscores the need for nuanced interpretations. Addressing concerns surrounding trust in scientists is essential to nurture a collaborative environment between scientists, policymakers, and the public, ensuring the continued role of scientific expertise in shaping evidence-based policies for a better future.




Photo Credits: https://www.thebalancemoney.com/science-careers-525645

Share This